bjournal::juxtapoz

15th May 2009

Text

Officiating

Not sure how many of my intermittent visitors (though, I don’t think Google Analytics tracks RSS feeds) are (were) watching the Rockets/Lakers game, but Kobe Bryant was just called for a technical foul (I’ll post a video later). There are a couple of things to comment on:

1. Whichever Van Gundy is calling this game is an idiot. Artest got bumped in the head and ran off the court. Later, when Kobe and Ron-Ron were talking, the video tape clearly showed a cut on Artest’s tongue, which nobody commented on since Van Gundy was too busy flapping his trap about how Artest “overracted” and “sold the foul.”
2. The officiating in the NBA, and definitely in the playoffs, is terrible. Awful. Atrocious. Pathetic. As an example, on the play we are talking about, Kobe ran right into Artest, and in addition to the head-butt technical, the result of the play was that Artest got called with a foul. I didn’t mis-type that. Kobe got a technical for head-butting Artest, but Artest got a foul called on him for being in Kobe’s way on the same play. There are a number of reasons for sub-standard officiating:
   1. The rules are ill-defined.
   2. The way David Stern wants the rules to be enforced is sometimes contrary to the way the rules are written.
   3. The refs are human (and may be unethical)
   4. The refs and David Stern think the refs’ responsibility is to control the game
3. Anybody who plays the game knows what a foul is what a foul isn’t.

From my perspective and sensibilities, there is an easy solution to the problem of bad officiating: get rid of officals. The “foul/contest + observer”* mechanic of ultimate will take the place of officials. Many people would be skeptical of such a plan, but I must say that I have never played in an ultimate game where the officials had a significant impact on the outcome of the game (mostly because there aren’t any).

Undoubtedly, one of the biggest arguments against removing officials would be players like Kobe who think that every time they are touched, even if they initiate the contact, that it is a foul. I believe that the reason Kobe, and players of his ilk (which is a lot, by the way, I only chose Kobe because we were already talking about him, and he is being particularly whiney tonight) are sensitve to being fouled is because of officials. In fact, if you look at basic basketball strategy, much of it is centered around getting fouled. That seems wrong to me, and if you think about it, it is wrong. The game is about players.

Officials (observers), would still be necessary, of course, especially during the transition. They would be used to reset the shotclock, rule on twos and threes, call three-second and illegal defense violations, etc. Of course, they would also be there to resolve disputes and to intervene if necessary, and the League would review players’ foul/contest behaviours, and issue penalties if needed.

Think about it. Players controlling the game.

* A player calls a foul, the offending player can say ‘contest’ if they feel there wasn’t wrong doing, and the observer settles disputes, should they arrive. A contested foul results in a “do-over” essentially.

Tags rssbasketballofficiatingultimateRon ArtestKobe Bryant

4th May 2009

Text

Medium-Shorts?

You know what nobody is talking about? The abnormal shortness of Ron Artest’s uniform shorts. Look at highlights from the Monday game against the Lakers.

Tags rssbasketballron artestfashion